Charlie Savage’s avatarCharlie Savage’s Twitter Archive—№ 10,484

  1. …in reply to @joshgerstein
    @joshgerstein The exchange seemed garbled to me. Scenarios of putting out info that will hurt the US = prior restraint injunction. "Contempt" instead connotes refusing to comply with a subpoena to testify about one's sources, right?
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar Mood -8 🙁