Charlie Savage’s avatarCharlie Savage’s Twitter Archive—№ 10,891

        1. Embedded in Barr remarks is an important qualifier: Trump campaign collusion with WikiLeaks could not be an illegal conspiracy because WL publication of the emails was not a crime since WL didn't help hack them.
          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 896 Retweets ❤️ 1,505 Favorites Mood -5 🙁
      1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
        I addressed the problem of trying to make WikiLeaks's role in the 2016 election interference a "crime" in this explainer about the Assange indictment last week nytimes.com/2019/04/11/us/politics/assange-indictment.html
        oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 48 Retweets ❤️ 152 Favorites Mood -5 🙁
    1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
      This, by the way, is why this National Review hot take on the Assange indictment -- trying to make it seem like a Deep State conspiracy that Assange wasn't charged with a crime for "collusion with Russia" -- was dumb. nationalreview.com/2019/04/why-isnt-assange-charged-with-collusion-with-russia/
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 30 Retweets ❤️ 109 Favorites Mood -10 🙁
  1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
    Notably, the part of the report that contains evidence about Trump campaign outreach to WikiLeaks section of the report is one of the most heavily redacted sections, largely for potential harm to ongoing matters (see, e.g., the Roger Stone case). Here is a representative sample.
    oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 33 Retweets ❤️ 55 Favorites Mood +1 🙂