Charlie Savage’s avatarCharlie Savage’s Twitter Archive—№ 11,043

  1. …in reply to @VicToensing
    @VicToensing 1. The White House disclosed the documents at issue in the McGahn subpoena to his counsel, a third party outside the White House. Here's Espy on that fact pattern:
    oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar Mood -2 🙁
    1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
      @VicToensing 2. Barr made public the portions of the Mueller report that describe and quote both internal WH documents and McGahn's account of his conversations with Trump. Here's Fast & Furious ruling on the consequences of very similar fact pattern:
      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar Mood -3 🙁
      1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
        @VicToensing To be clear I'm not saying these precedents are dispositive. I'm merely explaining that this is the issue the court fight will be about, in light of these precedents and their reasoning. And as such, I'm rejecting your still-rationale-free critique of my explainer.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar Mood -3 🙁