Charlie Savage’s avatarCharlie Savage’s Twitter Archive—№ 11,242

              1. I think some gotcha takes are missing the mark re Barr’s comments about the “hysterical” media insinuating that the Trump admin was thinking about adding the citizenship question to the Census by executive fiat. There is something here worth scrutinizing, but it’s different. /1
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 14 Retweets ❤️ 13 Favorites Mood 0
            1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
              People are citing Barr saying Monday, after being asked about an executive order, that “it does provide a pathway for getting the question on the Census” -- but then saying Thursday that there was no truth to reports that the admin was weighing adding the q by executive fiat. /2
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 3 Retweets ❤️ 6 Favorites Mood -1 🙁
          1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
            The 1st problem with this is that on Monday, his fuller quote shows that the antecedent to “it” was a soon-to-be-revealed “approach we’re taking,” which is vague and doesn’t necessarily mean an executive order. /3
            oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 7 Favorites Mood -4 🙁
        1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
          The 2nd problem is that on Thursday, his fuller quote shows that Barr's point was that the admin was never thinking about putting the question on the Census *without going through judicial review,* i.e. just defying the injunction. He wasn't saying no exec action, period. /4
          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ❤️ 9 Favorites Mood -3 🙁
      1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
        So the take that these 2 statements amount to Barr saying they were thinking about using an executive action and then brazenly criticizing the media for saying they might use an executive action, is doubly off. But there is something else questionable here. /5
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 4 Retweets ❤️ 11 Favorites Mood -4 🙁
    1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
      Barr explained on Thursday that there is simply not enough time left to litigate a new rationale for putting the question on the Census. But that was just as true back on Monday when he nevertheless claimed there was a pathway for doing that. /6
      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 3 Retweets ❤️ 17 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
  1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
    Therefore, if what Barr said on Thursday is true, what he said on Monday was false at the time he said it: there was never a pathway. One potential explanation is on Monday, he was saying what Trump wanted to hear and what was politically expedient--not being an honest broker. /7
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ♻️ 5 Retweets ❤️ 15 Favorites Mood +3 🙂