Charlie Savage’s avatarCharlie Savage’s Twitter Archive—№ 8,531

      1. …in reply to @MiekeEoyang
        @MiekeEoyang Well, that's a suggestion you're imputing, not that I'm making...
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
      @MiekeEoyang It turns on the unknown of what the average number of coms in an MCT is /2
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0
  1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
    @MiekeEoyang If X=10, total annual 702 collection was 305.79M; upstream was 50.35M or 16.5% If X=100, total was 544.29M; upstream 288.85M 53.1% etc /3
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
      @MiekeEoyang Yes making this doubly weedy, these #s are of historical interest only anyway bc ending "about" collection sharply reduced MCT intake /4
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +2 🙂
      1. …in reply to @charlie_savage
        @MiekeEoyang With the added ambiguity that those hypotheticals doesn't account for the problem of some coms being broken into multiple transactions /5
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Charlie Savage’s avatar Mood -3 🙁